From 69b54d7c7c9435462322e451207a0de9b3409751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dheeraj Reddy Jonnalagadda Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 16:26:24 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1260/5403] drm/amdgpu: simplify return statement in amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init Remove the logically dead code in the last return statement of amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init. The condition res < 0 is redundant since res is already checked for a negative value earlier. Replace return res < 0 ? res : 0; with return 0 to improve clarity. Fixes: 63d4c081a556 ("drm/amdgpu: Optimize EEPROM RAS table I/O") Closes: https://scan7.scan.coverity.com/#/project-view/52337/11354?selectedIssue=1602413 Signed-off-by: Dheeraj Reddy Jonnalagadda Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c index 0d824f016916..52c16bfeccaa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c @@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control) } control->ras_fri = RAS_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(control, hdr->first_rec_offset); - return res < 0 ? res : 0; + return 0; } int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_check(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control) -- 2.54.0